3. Focus on Incoterms®: Standard Trade Terms
Teaching rewrite of Incoterms® foundations (allocation of cost, risk, customs, insurance). Pedagogical summaries only — not the official ICC Incoterms® rules text. For live contracts, buy and cite the current ICC publication.
A bare price like “€1000 per unit” does not say where delivery happens, who pays freight, who clears customs, or who buys cargo insurance. An Incoterms® rule plus a named place (and the edition) fills those gaps:
€1000 per unit DDP Beijing Incoterms® 2010
What Incoterms® allocate
Incoterms® (International Commercial Terms) are ICC standard trade terms — FOB, CIF, FCA, and the rest. In a sale contract they allocate, between seller and buyer:
- Transport costs
- Risk of loss or damage
- Export / import customs clearance and duties (where applicable)
- Insurance duties (only under CIF and CIP)
They also pin where the seller delivers (or hands goods to the carrier) when combined with a named place. Traders often call them “shipping” or “delivery” terms; ICC’s preferred label is trade terms, because they cover more than freight.
Incoterms® live in the contract of sale (seller ↔ buyer). Do not confuse them with liner terms or other carriage-contract labels (shipper ↔ carrier). Tell your forwarder which Incoterm you sold under so the booking matches the sale.
The eleven Incoterms ® 2010 rules sit on a ladder from minimum seller duty (EXW — buyer runs the whole move from the works) to maximum seller duty (DDP — delivered, import-cleared, ready to unload at destination).
flowchart LR
EXW[EXW] --> FCA[FCA]
FCA --> CPT[CPT / CIP]
CPT --> DAT[DAT / DAP]
DAT --> DDP[DDP]
FAS[FAS] --> FOB[FOB]
FOB --> CFR[CFR / CIF]
Any mode vs sea / inland waterway
| Class | Rules | Use when |
|---|---|---|
| Any mode (incl. multimodal; ship may be one leg) | EXW, FCA, CPT, CIP, DAT, DAP, DDP | Containers, air, road, rail, multimodal |
| Sea / inland waterway only | FAS, FOB, CFR, CIF | Port-to-port; often bulk / string sales |
Maritime rules assume a port delivery story and (for CFR/CIF) a transport document that can support selling goods in transit. Using FOB/CIF for pure air or inland container moves can put the seller in documentary breach. Prefer FCA / CPT / CIP for those moves.
Sea/inland waterway: FAS · FOB · CFR · CIF
Any mode: EXW · FCA · CPT · CIP · DAT · DAP · DDP
This lesson follows the Incoterms® 2010 map (the edition in many older guides and forms). Incoterms® 2020 is the current ICC edition: among other updates, DAT was renamed DPU (Delivered at Place Unloaded). Always name the edition in the contract.
How to use them in contracts
Incorporate explicitly, e.g.:
- Append to price/place:
FOB Rotterdam Incoterms® 2010 - Or pre-print on forms: “All transactions under this document are subject to Incoterms® 2010”
They are not legislation. Parties may exclude them or draft bespoke delivery/risk terms. If you use “FOB” / “FCA” without naming Incoterms®, meaning becomes ambiguous — though some courts treat Incoterms® as widely known trade usage under CISG Art. 9(2) even without an express cite. Best practice: always write the rule and the year.
Each contract is governed by the edition it cites. If it says only “Incoterms®”, tribunals often apply the version in force at contracting. ICC revises roughly once a decade — monitor between revisions, but you need not refresh yearly.
Brief origin
Major trading countries used to define FOB/CIF differently. ICC published the first broadly accepted Incoterms® set in 1936, with later revisions including 1953, 1967, 1976, 1980, 1990, 2000, and 2010 (then 2020).
C-terms vs D-terms (the loss-in-transit test)
| C-terms (CFR, CIF, CPT, CIP) | D-terms (DAT, DAP, DDP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Delivery fulfilled when? | Goods handed to the carrier / on board as the rule requires (shipment contract) | Goods arrive at the named destination ready as the rule requires (arrival contract) |
| Risk in international transit | Generally buyer’s after the shipment point | Generally seller’s until destination delivery |
| If cargo is lost at sea | Seller already delivered; buyer looks to insurance (and bears gaps) | Seller may be in breach — substitute goods / damages / other remedies |
FOB and CIF are both shipment contracts — a common myth is that “C” somehow means arrival. Under CIF, risk typically passes on board at shipment; the named destination is mainly where freight (and under CIF, insurance) is paid to, not where risk ends.
C-term: seller risk ──► [shipment point] ──► buyer risk ··· freight paid toward destination
D-term: seller risk ──────────────────────────────► [destination delivery]
What Incoterms® do not cover
| Topic | Who handles it |
|---|---|
| Price / payment method | Sale contract |
| Transfer of title / property | National law + contract (e.g. retention-of-title clause) — not Incoterms® |
| Breach remedies | Sale contract + governing law |
| How goods travel to the delivery point | Specify if it matters (e.g. refrigerated containers to FOB port) |
| Mandatory local law | Can override contract choices |
Delivery under an Incoterm ≠ automatic transfer of ownership. CISG also does not unify title transfer. Exporters often want a retention of title until paid — check local counsel; not every jurisdiction enforces it the same way.
Insurance duties
Only CIF and CIP make insurance a seller→buyer contractual duty. Other rules do not force either side to insure as between the parties — but commercial prudence still says insure what you bear.
Under CIF/CIP (2010 practice):
- At least Institute Cargo Clauses (C) (or similar) minimum cover
- Sum insured: contract price + 10%, in the contract currency
Minimum cover often excludes theft, pilferage, and rough handling — weak for high-value manufactures. War / strikes / riots (SRCC) and similar extensions must be named; vague “maximum insurance” leaves the seller to pick cover and creates uncertainty.
Agree in the sale contract: which clauses, from where to where, storage days, war/SRCC, profit %, currency, and other add-ons — do not rely on the Incoterm alone.
Incoterms® 2010 design notes (operator view)
| Change / feature | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| DAT + DAP replace DAF / DES / DEQ / DDU | 13 → 11 rules; DAT = unloaded at terminal; DAP = ready for unloading at place |
| Two classes: any-mode vs sea | Stops misusing maritime rules for containers/air |
| “On board” (not ship’s rail) for FOB/CFR/CIF | Matches modern practice |
| Domestic + international | Export/import formalities only where applicable |
| Guidance Notes | Teaching aids — not part of the binding rule text |
| Electronic communications | Same effect as paper if agreed or customary |
| Security clearances | A2/B2, A10/B10-style assist / obtain duties |
| Terminal handling | Clearer allocation so buyers are less often billed twice |
| “Procure goods shipped” | Supports string sales (middle sellers who do not themselves load) |
Pedagogical map of the 11 rules (2010)
The blurbs below are teaching summaries. Negotiate from the full ICC Incoterms® book for your edition.
Any mode of transport
| Rule | Seller delivers when… | Watch-outs |
|---|---|---|
| EXW | Goods at buyer’s disposal at named works/place; seller need not load or clear export | Buyer runs export — avoid if buyer cannot clear; FCA often better if seller should load |
| FCA | Goods to carrier (or buyer’s nominee) at named place; seller clears export where applicable | Name the exact point; risk passes there |
| CPT | Goods to carrier; seller pays carriage to named destination | Delivery (risk) ≠ destination (cost); default risk may pass at first carrier |
| CIP | Like CPT + seller buys insurance for buyer’s risk | Insurance is minimum unless upgraded |
| DAT | Unloaded at named terminal at destination | Specify terminal/point; beyond terminal → DAP/DDP |
| DAP | At named place, ready for unloading (not import-cleared) | Import formalities/duties for buyer |
| DDP | At named place, import-cleared, ready for unloading | Max seller duty; avoid if seller cannot clear import; VAT/taxes unless agreed otherwise |
Sea and inland waterway
| Rule | Seller delivers when… | Watch-outs |
|---|---|---|
| FAS | Alongside the vessel at named port of shipment | Bad fit for containers handed at a terminal → use FCA |
| FOB | On board the vessel (or procure already on board) | Containers usually FCA; string sales via “procure” |
| CFR | On board + seller pays freight to named destination port | Risk on board at shipment; unloading cost fights common; containers → CPT |
| CIF | Like CFR + minimum insurance for buyer | Same two-point cost/risk split; containers → CIP |
Under CPT / CIP / CFR / CIF, the seller’s delivery duty is met at the shipment / hand-over point — not when goods arrive.
A/B article skeleton
Each rule pairs A (seller) and B (buyer) articles covering, among other things: general duties; licences / security clearances; carriage & insurance contracts; delivery / taking delivery; risk; costs; notices; delivery documents / proof; packing / inspection; information assistance.
You do not memorize article numbers in this lesson — you learn to ask for each deal: who contracts carriage, who insures, where risk passes, who clears export/import, who pays which terminal charges.
Shipment vs arrival contracts
| Family | Rules (2010) | Idea |
|---|---|---|
| Shipment | EXW, FAS, FOB, FCA, CFR, CIF, CPT, CIP | Seller done at the agreed shipment/hand-over point; L/C culture grew with this model |
| Arrival | DAT, DAP, DDP | Seller still at risk (and usually paying carriage) until destination delivery |
F-terms and C-terms share shipment-contract risk logic — C-terms simply add that the seller also pays main carriage (and under CIP/CIF, buys insurance).
Why more deals quote D-terms
- One party arranging the whole move can get better freight rates
- Seller keeps quality/timing control on high-value goods
- Buyers compare offers more easily when price is “delivered”
Higher D-term prices often price in that extra risk.
Practical traps
Ship before B/L. Goods may arrive before the buyer holds an original bill of lading. Masters sometimes release against bank guarantees / LOIs. That practice weakens the documentary-credit security model (goods only against original B/L) — treat it as a risk, not routine.
Variants (“CIF landed”, “FOB stowed”, …). Incoterms® 2010 does not standardize those add-ons. Changing cost wording can accidentally shift risk or customs responsibility. If you vary a rule, write explicitly what moves: duties, clearance admin, non-clearance risk, unloading costs, or all of the above.
Operator checklist
- Cite
[RULE] [named place] Incoterms® [year]every time - Keep the official ICC book for that year at hand
- Pick any-mode vs sea-only correctly (containers → FCA/CPT/CIP, not FOB/CIF by habit)
- Add contract detail Incoterms® omit: insurance extent, transport constraints, force majeure / time extensions if you clear or deliver inland abroad
- Align forwarder instructions with the sale Incoterm
- On C-terms, remember: named place ≈ cost end-point; risk already passed at shipment — specify both points when it matters
Court snapshots (usage, not magic words)
Public U.S. cases often treat Incoterms® as CISG Art. 9(2) usages when the governing law brings in the CISG — even if the contract only said “CIF …” without “Incoterms®”:
- St. Paul Guardian Ins. v. Neuromed (S.D.N.Y. 2002): MRI sold “CIF New York Seaport”; damage in transit. Court applied Incoterms® CIF via German law / CISG usages — risk had passed on shipment of goods loaded in good order.
- BP Oil Int’l v. Empresa Estatal Petroleos de Ecuador (5th Cir. 2003): CFR gasoline; on-load inspection OK, arrival gum content high. Court applied Incoterms® CFR via CISG usages — risk passed on loading; seller had delivered.
Lesson: still write the edition; do not gamble that a court will fill gaps the way you hoped.
Check: Incoterms®
Incoterms® trade terms
1 / 5Incoterms® primarily allocate…
Pick an answer to see if you are right.
Takeaways
- Always write rule + named place + Incoterms® year
- Sea-only vs any-mode — do not FOB/CIF container/air by habit
- C-terms = shipment contracts (two points: risk vs paid freight); D-terms = arrival risk for seller
- Incoterms® ≠ title, price, payment method, or carriage-contract terms
- Only CIF/CIP force seller-bought insurance — and it is minimum unless you specify more
Further Reading
- 2. Documents and the transaction sequence — where Incoterms® sit in the deal timeline
- 1. Introduction to export–import
- International Business home
- Next: 4. International trade law — CISG, choice of law, remedies
- Later (planned): payment instruments (L/Cs in depth) · carriage documents · insurance
- Official rules: purchase the current ICC Incoterms® publication for the edition you cite (ICC)